In our previous post, through excerpts from Dr. Corsi’s book, Killing the Deep State: The Fight to Save President Trump, published in March, 2018, we exposed how in seamless fashion, upon Trump’s 2016 election victory the forces of darkness transition to destroying his incoming administration by instantly transitioning to Plan B. In this post, we expose the “Insurance Policy” that the FBI’s Peter Strzok and other Deep Staters had concocted just in case Trump won the presidency in spite of their worst efforts to avoid that outcome.
The deep state resolves to deny Trump the White House
On January 6, 2017, a partially declassified intelligence community assessment commissioned by President Obama and issued by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, DNI, concluded that Russia had interfered with the U.S. presidential election in a bid to help Trump. We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election.
Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency, the DNI report said. We further assess Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments, the report continued.
The report concluded that Putin most likely wanted to discredit Secretary Clinton because he has publicly blamed her since 2011 for inciting mass protests against his regime in late 2011 and early 2012, and because he holds a grudge for comments he almost certainly saw as disparaging him. The DNI report stressed that the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, NSA, all agreed with this judgment. With this report, the deep state positioned the Russian collusion meme as its first choice strategy for blocking Donald Trump from becoming president.
In contrast, by December 13, 2000, Al Gore had abandoned his presidential bid, accepting the decision of the Supreme Court as a campaign-ending decision. In December 2016, the DNI intelligence report gave Democrats new hope that Hillary Clinton may yet be inaugurated as president if Trump’s collusion with Russia could be proven. With the publication of this intelligence community assessment, the deep state game to deny Donald J. Trump the presidency was on in earnest.
As former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said on Meet the Press in March 2017, we did not include any evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI, and CIA with my office, the Director of National Intelligence, that had anything that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report. Paradise Lost Hillary not only lost the opportunity to shatter the glass ceiling on election night 2016, her supporters also lost the opportunity to create a far-left utopia that they felt was certainly within their grasp.
With Hillary as president, Obama could look forward to a continuation of his eight-year Saul Alinsky-like effort to fundamentally transform the United States into a socialist nation that warmly embraced radical Islamic extremists, including the Muslim Brotherhood. With the Democrats thrown into disarray by Hillary’s defeat, the party resolved to move further to the left, determined to pursue a radical hard-left agenda consistent with the deep state’s determination that Donald Trump must never be permitted to govern. After eight years in office, Barack Obama had set the stage for a Hillary Clinton presidency that would once and for all time recast the American Charter with new legislation and Supreme Court decisions that would transform what Obama had achieved into a final rewriting of the American Covenant.
Where our Founding Fathers desired to limit government power to protect and preserve individual liberties, the Democrats under Obama and Hillary sought to establish a Marxist-leaning social welfare state consistent with globalist one-world government ambitions. Hillary Clinton’s speeches to Goldman Sachs left no doubt that her political philosophy called for statist control over an international bank-driven finance system supporting the development of international business dominating a global economy. Hillary’s America Imagine how different the United States would have been had Hillary won the presidential election defeating Donald Trump in 2016.
Her ambitions to extend Obama’s social welfare state and identity politics to a new level was clear, given her many campaign pronouncements and the public policy statements published on her campaign website. Hillary and her supporters felt that with her victory, the achievement of a totalitarian far-left utopia was within their reach. In short, if Hillary had won, the hard-left Alinsky acolytes taking over the Democratic party would have had the chance to eliminate from the United States all those Hillary defines as irredeemable deplorables, that is, people she saw as racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamophobic Trump supporters.
In her post-election book, What Happened?, Hillary speculated that her presidency would have been transformative by implementing higher minimum wages, expanding social welfare programs and increasing government intervention into our economic and social lives by a host of new regulations imposed by an ever-expanding core of unelected bureaucrats.
The 2016 election was more than a contest between candidates; it was a struggle over who would control the meaning of democratic legitimacy. At its center was a fundamental distinction that deserves careful attention: evidence that Russia sought to influence the election is not the same as evidence that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia. When those two propositions were treated as interchangeable, public debate became vulnerable to both institutional overreach and Deep State partisan exploitation. The credibility of intelligence agencies depends not only upon the accuracy of their conclusions, but also upon their dedication to clearly separate verified facts, informed assessments, and unresolved questions without bias.
The comparison with the 2000 election raises an equally important issue concerning the peaceful transfer of power. Al Gore was forced to accept the Supreme Court’s decision as the Democrat party had not yet exposed its communist bent as its support base had not yet veered totally to the far-Left, while the post-2016 was a brazen attempt to keep an election outcome permanently open to reversal. Yet, the broader lesson is only now being realized: democratic institutions cannot survive if elections are accepted only when one’s preferred candidate wins. Legal challenges, investigations, and oversight are legitimate; efforts to delegitimize an opponent through insinuation, selective disclosure, or claims of hidden control threaten the same constitutional order that Leftist political movements claim to defend.
Political disagreement can quickly evolve into moral absolutism. The competing visions of government—limited government and individual liberty on one side, socialism morphing into communist tyranny on the other—are not disagreements within a pluralistic republic, but a battle between freedom and totalitarianism. The Democratic Socialists today use language that may energize supporters, but it narrows the space for compromise and turns fellow citizens into existential enemies. The danger is especially acute when terms such as “far-right,” “racist,” or “deplorable” are used as political shortcuts that replace examination of actual policies with judgments about the character and loyalty of entire groups.
The impact of this era is already being felt in declining trust. Citizens now know intelligence agencies manipulate elections and are rejecting illegitimate national-security findings; the Leftists are merely agents of foreign powers, extraordinary measures to salvage our republic are required. The unfortunate cycle: every investigation is interpreted as persecution, every leak as proof of conspiracy, and every institutional defense as evidence of corruption. Facts do not disappear, but they lose their authority as the gaslighting intensifies.
Technology increases these pressures. Campaigns are already operating amid synthetic audio, fabricated documents, targeted propaganda, anonymous influence networks, and rapidly circulating fragments stripped of context. Foreign governments exploit our domestic divisions, but domestic actors also have powerful incentives to deny foreign interference for partisan advantage. The central challenge is not to simply detect manipulation; it is to distinguish genuine national-security threats from politically convenient narratives about those threats. Transparency, independent review, clear evidentiary standards, and prompt correction are essential safeguards.
The enduring question is whether Americans will define their country by the triumph of a particular ideology or by the integrity of the process through which competing ideologies are tested. A nation committed to constitutional government must be able to investigate foreign interference without converting suspicion into conviction, pursue a populist political rebirth while holding enemies of the state accountable, and reform institutions to restore faith in every institution. The future impact: a warning about the dangers of concentrated power and partisan mythmaking—or a precedent for permanently accepting gaslighting as legitimate.
Do those dots connect? You decide.
The search for truth continues, go to godsfivestones.com for more information and to donate to support our efforts:
Ending Stolen Elections
Defeating Political Corruption
Justice for Obama’s Coup d-Etat
Ending Child & Sex Exploitation
Leading Spiritual Warfare
John 1:5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
GodsFiveStones.com is a tax-deductible 501(c)3 foundation created by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., and Karladine Graves, M.D., managed by Capstone Legacy Foundation.
Corsi Nation Website: https://www.corsination.com
Corsi Nation Sponsor: MyVitalC – ESS60 in Organic OliveOil
https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/
