In our previous post, through excerpts from Dr. Corsi’s book, Killing the Deep State: The Fight to Save President Trump, published in March, 2018, we exposed the various methods the Deep State used to try to prevent Donald Trump from becoming President in 2017 by manipulating the Electoral College and how all of those efforts came crashing down. In this post, we expose how Democrats embrace violence and align with the darkest of forces to burn down the U.S. Lie, cheat, steal, destroy becomes the party mantra.
Chapter 5
Democrats Go Hard Left
Instead of seeking support from the center of the political spectrum, the Democratic Party has moved ever leftward, embracing positions that leave millions of Americans feeling left out. Eric Reimer, December 2017 When the move to deny Trump an Electoral College victory failed, Democrats and their supporters turned their attention away from the Clintons, resolving not just to resist Trump, but to complete the hard-left takeover of the Democratic Party. They now wanted to set the stage for gaining a leftist majority to retake Congress in 2018, in the quest to find another Obama-like charismatic radical to retake the White House in 2020.
Once Trump was inaugurated, the Democrats’ goal shifted to impeaching Trump, removing him from office by invoking the 25th Amendment, or forcing him to resign, with Pence then becoming president. In fact, Democrats were calling for Trump’s impeachment even before he was inaugurated. Dozens of Democratic lawmakers refused to attend his inauguration. The Trump presidency was under siege almost immediately after he took the oath, setting the stage for the deep state strategy that would not give Trump a moment to breathe.
The Democrats eyed a repeat of Jimmy Carter’s defeat of Gerald Ford in 1976, following Nixon’s resignation on August 9th, 1974, when Nixon preferred resignation to almost certain impeachment and removal from office over Watergate, blowing up the White House. Protesting Donald Trump’s presidency, famed singer Madonna gave a profanity-laced address in Washington, D.C. on January 21st, 2017, to a Women’s March crowd estimated at 500,000 strong, a number various mainstream media reports argued was twice the number that had attended Trump’s inauguration the day before.
“Yes, I’m angry. Yes, I’m outraged,” Madonna said, expressing her dismay at what the mainstream media accounts described as the shocking Electoral College win of Minority President Donald Trump. Women in the protest march wore pink pussyhats knitted to display prominent feline ears. The hats symbolized opposition to a conversation recorded on a bus between Trump and Billy Bush, then host of Access Hollywood, a recording of that conversation was leaked to the Washington Post and published on Friday, October 7th, 2016, two days before the second presidential debate. In that conversation, which Trump did not suspect was being recorded, Trump can be heard boasting in terms crude, even in a locker room, about grabbing women by their sexual organs. Predictably, the mainstream media discounted Trump’s apology, as well as his counter-argument.
While his words were foolish and inappropriate, Bill Clinton lost his law license for much worse, namely for lying about sexual advances he made toward Paula Jones, then an Arkansas state employee when Clinton was governor of Arkansas. The height of Madonna’s protest speech came when she cautioned that women would face a new age of tyranny under President Trump, adding the following incendiary language. “Yes, I’ve thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House, but I know this won’t change anything.” We cannot fall into despair. Madonna attempted to explain away her obvious threat to the president by placing her protests in the context of love.
“Welcome the revolution of love,” she said, “to the rebellion, to our refusal as women to accept this new age of tyranny. We’re not just women in danger, but all marginalized people.” Responding to the estimated 5 million that took part in the 2017 Women’s March protest nationwide, President Trump tweeted, “Watched protests yesterday, but was under the impression that we just had an election. Why didn’t these people vote? Celebs hurt cause badly.”
Despite making women’s issues the centerpiece of her campaign, Hillary Clinton lost the votes of white women overall, and struggled to win the votes of women without a college education in swing states, including Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. All states President Obama won in 2008 and 2012. A real importance of the 2017 Women’s March was that it signaled the degree to which the base of the Democratic Party was moving toward the far left.
The pussy protesters in the nation’s streets after the election were radical feminists, new feminists of the hard left, who were angry not only about the economic inequality of women, but about the white male privilege they believe is at the core of American capitalist oppression. The women Hillary needed for victory might have voted for Bernie Sanders, but they were not impressed by Hillary Clinton. For these radical feminists, Clinton was a part of the past. A past dominated by too many six-figure fees paid to her by Goldman Sachs for her Wall Street speeches. A past tarnished by Clinton Foundation financial scandals and pay-to-play allegations.
Hillary’s past was truly ridden with scandal. She could not explain why Ambassador Chris Stevens had died at Benghazi, or why she had refused to use the secure email devices provided by the State Department that were required to comply with national security laws. Truthfully, there was much in Hillary’s past that remained questionable and difficult to explain. From her being fired as a Watergate attorney, to her role in Whitewater, or from the death of Vincent Foster, to the fact that Hillary’s billing file from the Rose Law Firm was found squirreled away in a closet in the White House private residence.
Add to this her husband’s sexual escapades, plus a dozen other scandals that had plagued Hillary’s career since she first stepped onto the public stage. With Hillary’s loss to Trump, the hard left had only one objective, and Madonna captured it particularly well. Blow up the White House. While Madonna’s supporters insisted that she did not mean this threat literally, Madonna’s inability to accept Donald Trump as president triggered the hard left’s determination to impair his presidency with incessant resistance and obstruction.
Crooked Hillary might have lost the election, but the hard left’s vision of completing Obama’s fundamental transformation of America had only just begun. Now with Hillary a two-time loser in presidential elections, Democrats could promote candidates from within the party’s hard left ranks who supported the radical left’s agenda on issues ranging from open borders to same-sex marriage and tilting foreign policy to favor Islam over Israel.
The Democrat Party’s post-2016 response was a decisive movement away from electoral moderation and toward ideological resistance. Democrats dropped all pretense of reason and calm: from the anger surrounding Trump’s victory, the scale of the Women’s March, and the belief among leftist activists concluded that ordinary political opposition was insufficient. The Hard Left radicals saw revolution and tyranny as the best way to build a broad coalition that included progressives, feminists, and “ordinary” Democrat voters to unite in order to neuter the new administration.
The boundary between legitimate resistance and refusal to accept democratic outcomes had been crossed. Protesting policies, organizing campaigns, challenging executive actions, and demanding congressional oversight are fundamental democratic practices. Likewise, impeachment is a constitutional process rather than inherently an attempted coup when the basis has merit. However, declaring a president illegitimate when no evidence to back up that false notion was ever established, and treating every administrative action as proof of dictatorship, turned oversight into permanent obstruction. Democrat opposition based upon the fabrication that the election itself was morally invalid, enabled the Deep State to gaslight Democrats into a sense of moral obligation to break out the pitch forks and tar on demand.
Hillary Clinton’s manifold flaws point to a strategic problem within the Democrat Party. A candidate’s gender, “progressive” credentials, and ties to established institutions cannot substitute for public trust, especially among working-class voters and communities that feel culturally or economically neglected. The party’s post-election shift toward violent activism may have helped mobilize younger voters and expand the tired debate over inequality, healthcare, labor rights, and women’s rights, but risked alienating voters who wanted economic reform without revolutionary rhetoric and action. The Democrat Party erred as the enthusiasm of their base, manipulated into pursuing Deep State goals, became more internally incoherent while at the same time becoming less electorally competitive.
Again, the future impact of the Democrats leftward plunge has only resulted in polarization, senseless protests and violence, and complete loss of moral legitimacy. Democrats treat moderate voters as obstacles rather than persuadable citizens. To overcome the lack of stronger grassroots participation, the Deep State has created rent-a-mobs to replace real support. The new Democrat strategy is to make each election an existential crisis…imagined by the Left, and real for the supporters of the republic.
The enduring lesson of the Democrat Party leftward spiral is that resistance movements must be based upon truth. Falsely portraying the supporters of our country’s foundational principles (half of the electorate) as irredeemable is a purposeful move to create civil war in the aftermath of a failed take over. A durable coalition for positive change cannot be based merely upon outrage and hate; it must coherently persuade citizens who do not share its ideology how its vision would improve the human condition.
Do those dots connect? You decide.
The search for truth continues, go to godsfivestones.com for more information and to donate to support our efforts:
Ending Stolen Elections
Defeating Political Corruption
Justice for Obama’s Coup d-Etat
Ending Child & Sex Exploitation
Leading Spiritual Warfare
John 1:5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
GodsFiveStones.com is a tax-deductible 501(c)3 foundation created by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., and Karladine Graves, M.D., managed by Capstone Legacy Foundation.
Corsi Nation Website: https://www.corsination.com
Corsi Nation Sponsor: MyVitalC – ESS60 in Organic OliveOil
https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/
